Introduction:
"Six Days, Five Boards" hits the limit down at the opening, and the whole drama ends!
This kind of situation is not uncommon in the stock market. However, behind the tempting "Six Days, Five Boards" lies a black swan with enormous risks.
Retail investors are facing a financial crisis, no matter what they pay, they cannot recover their losses.
But for a stock investor, what kind of experience is a six-day board?
And after hitting the limit up, hitting the limit down at the opening, did the stock investor make money or lose money?
What kind of secrets are hidden behind this?
Let's go into the stock market together and take a look.
After six consecutive limit-ups, it hits the limit down at the opening in one second.
In the stock market, limit-up and limit-down are phenomena we often encounter, and it is not a minority that hits the limit down at the opening like this.When individual stocks open with a limit down after experiencing six consecutive limit-ups, it is mainly reflected in three aspects:
First, it is in line with the overall trend, second, the involvement of large funds, and third, the sudden occurrence of a black swan event.
Advertisement
Firstly, after experiencing the ups and downs of the stock market, individual stocks rise against the trend, showing strong resilience. However, this resilience often implies the involvement of large funds, so investors should also maintain a degree of caution to avoid being harvested by large funds.
Secondly, sudden black swan events can also lead to this outcome.
Next, let's take a look at the stocks that collapsed to a limit down within a second after six consecutive limit-ups.
The first is Jiayun Technology, which was previously listed on the Shenzhen Stock Exchange. Jiayun Technology had experienced two bankruptcy reorganizations in three years and was given a valuation of up to 30 billion yuan by many mainstream institutions, attracting a large number of investors.
However, two months after going public, its market value was halved, and twenty million investors were trampled to death, killing tens of thousands of private equity firms. Yet, at the most difficult time, the promised valuation of 30 billion yuan was left without a buyer.
As time passed, the market value evaporated to 1.5 billion yuan within two years of listing, and its total market value was only left with 1.4 billion yuan.
Under these circumstances, Jiayun Technology suddenly issued a limit-up announcement, and it touched the limit-up the next day.
When investors thought this stock was about to rebound, it fell to a limit down within a second of opening, causing a huge blow to investors.Secondly, when Huaz Science and Technology first went public, it had touched 26 limit-downs, but the reason for its limit-downs was also caused by the pledge of its controlling shareholders.
Two years later, as the stock price of Huaz Science and Technology fell to its lowest point, with a drop of more than 75%, Huaz Science and Technology suddenly issued an announcement of a limit-up.
Many investors thought it was a signal that its stock was about to rebound and bought the stock one after another, but what they didn't expect was that Huaz Science and Technology suddenly issued a "major matter suspension and resumption of trading announcement", and the stock hit the limit-down on the second day of trading, and a large number of investors were mowed down like leeks.
The third is ST Shenji, the news of selling land in front of ST Shenji pushed it to the limit-up board, facing a series of limit-ups, ST Shenji was also a board member of 16 limit-downs, but this was equivalent to riding a roller coaster.

However, after experiencing 16 limit-downs, ST Shenji suddenly issued a limit-up message, stating in the announcement that it had received a "major message prompt letter", and it also hit the limit-up on the second day of trading.
What many investors did not expect was that the stock hit the limit-down again on the second day of trading, catching all investors in one net.
Subsequently, *ST Shenji also issued an announcement stating that its stock trading had not had any trading volume and price for 20 consecutive days.
The fourth is Jingtongling, when its increase reached 20%, a huge order appeared, and then a limit-up was opened.
Then Jingtongling issued another announcement, stating that its semi-annual report was overdue, and it hit the limit-down.
According to analysis, the reason for Jingtongling's issuance of the limit-down announcement this time was not due to the quarterly financial report, but because there is a "dark" shareholder behind it.The fifth is Duolun Technology. After it hit the upper limit, it announced a suspension for acquisition purposes. However, after a four-day suspension, the exchange issued a notice of significant matters. Subsequently, Duolun Technology's stock hit the lower limit, leading all investors to believe that the spring for technology stocks had arrived, but such an unexpected event occurred.
The sixth is *ST Dazhou, which has a huge debt behind it. Its controlling rights have been frozen by the court, and there is a risk of recovery. It is also a holding company under court bankruptcy reorganization. *ST Dazhou hit the lower limit in the first second of the opening. Delong Holdings Yili Energy has a total of five holding subsidiaries, but four of them are already in the bankruptcy reorganization stage.
The reason for hitting the lower limit after six days and five boards. When we see these individual stocks experiencing the phenomenon of hitting the lower limit in one second after "six days and five boards," we can't help but think of our own investment experiences. When individual stocks suddenly issue announcements, they will attract the attention of investors, but this investment method is not necessarily profitable.
However, in today's stock market, retail investors tend to ignore the implementation of large funds and prefer those typical "eating melon announcements." Therefore, retail investors are also called "leeks." It is precisely because "eating melon announcements" often bring more liquidity that compared with those large funds' "eating meat announcements," retail investors prefer this kind of "eating melon announcement."
Short-term high returns often make retail investors lose their rationality and engage in blind chasing behavior. Therefore, when facing risks, they often fall into huge losses.In today's A-share market, retail investors account for 70% of the market. However, if retail investors do not want to be harvested, they must learn to diversify their investments and not blindly follow trends. At the same time, they should also maintain a sense of rationality in the market and not be attracted by short-term high returns, engaging in blind buying and selling.
Especially during market fluctuations, it is even more important to maintain calm and not let short-term losses cloud their judgment, leading to blind bottom-fishing operations. In the stock market, there can never be stocks that are guaranteed to make a profit without any loss. Retail investors need to be responsible for their investment actions, and only through long-term compound growth can wealth accumulation be achieved.
The difficulty between regulatory authorities and retail investors.
The registration system in the A-share market has always been on the edge of policy. Although the implementation of the registration system has been carried out in the Science and Technology Innovation Board and the Growth Enterprise Market, the market's response is not obvious. Many people believe that the implementation of the market's registration system is not keeping up with the overall market trend.
However, in today's Chinese market, the A-share market itself has certain policy restrictions. Because in the global stock market, the most unscrupulous main force is the A-share market. For example, in the A-share market, the main force can arbitrarily suppress individual stock prices, and even suppress the stock price to 30 cents; they can also dig up retail investors' "sugar daddies," which is also not allowed in the United States.China's market also urgently needs healthy development, so for top leaders, the regulation of the A-share market is particularly important.
However, between countries, each country's market rules also vary greatly.
For example, in the U.S. stock market, only when the stock profit reaches 20% will someone buy; on the contrary, if the stock loses 20%, someone will sell.
This is different from retail investors, who buy to make a profit, buy to rise, and sell to lose.
However, in the A-share market, retail investors are all following the trend, and stock price fluctuations will lead to profits.
In the A-share market, the number of retail investors is very large, but behind them, the profit gap between secondary market investors and them is very large.
But from another perspective, this also shows that the vitality of the A-share market is extremely abundant.
Therefore, the regulatory authorities also face choices.
On the one hand, they need to protect the interests of the vast number of retail investors, and on the other hand, they also need to maintain the market's activity while achieving good and stable development.
The regulatory authorities need to find a balance between the two.Conclusion:
In the A-share market, many retail investors enter the market in pursuit of short-term high returns. However, this behavior without a sense of security will inevitably lead to a heavy price.
Retail investors should maintain rationality when entering the market, avoid blindly following trends, and learn to diversify their investments. Do not let the pursuit of short-term gains and losses affect your investment returns.
If retail investors do not want to become "chives", they must learn the method of "harvesting chives".